| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 |
141. Contract Scams are exploiting a bug -- this needs to be fixed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bill Shankly sorry but if the buyer cant read then hows that an exploit ? If there was something to read, it wouldn't be a problem -- that's the point -- The problem is on the contracts with a single item for sale, it doe...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.22 19:54:00
|
142. Contract Scams are exploiting a bug -- this needs to be fixed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In the contract system there is a bug that is being exploited and offenders need to be reported for this. CCP needs to fix this bug to stop the exploitation. On contracts for items that have a quantity of anything other than one (1), the quantity...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.22 19:41:00
|
143. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Dawne Xi on 21/12/2006 09:03:04 Decarus and all you other "No Qty means One" crowd, Decarus' rant actually got me to thinking, and look what I found.... Apparently the devs deemed it necessary to help clarify what a Blueprint was go...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.21 09:01:00
|
144. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Decarus It's really just a choice of preference. Would you say "I got one banana" or "I got one times one banana". Me slow? Cute :) The sign of one losing an arguement -- call the other person names :) Anyway -- Let's c...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.21 08:41:00
|
145. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sile Suirghiche Adding "x1" is not a problem for the coders and is not going to cost you money (unless you're a scammer). If this little oversight had not happened, do you actually think anyone would be able to make a reas...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.20 19:33:00
|
146. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Dawne Xi on 20/12/2006 19:14:48 Well Vil'Hem for a brief few minutes there you started to make sense... until the post just above this one, so I'll repost what I had removed previously since I thought you actually started to underst...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.20 19:14:00
|
147. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Dawne Xi on 20/12/2006 19:03:22 Edited by: Dawne Xi on 20/12/2006 19:02:16 Church Lady Voice: Nevermind
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.20 19:01:00
|
148. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Taince Vohen Show me exactly where a contract to sell a single item says that it's a quantity of one. No one who says this has yet been able to. And if the answer is "No quantity listed means one," that's not an answer. Whe...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.20 18:56:00
|
149. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Decarus And I'm still sticking to: "Nobody is going to get scammed if they'd read over the contract. Show me exactly where a contract to sell a single item says that it's a quantity of one. No one who says this has yet b...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.20 18:33:00
|
150. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vil'Hem Rekrap If it's intended to show just the item if the quantity is 1 and the item + "X (insert quantity here)" if it's more than one...this isn't really an exploit or a bug. If a player doesn't familiarize him/herself...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.20 16:04:00
|
151. Lastest scam for Contrats (aka ESCROW) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Dawne Xi on 19/12/2006 20:07:41 Originally by: Yurii Chan Edited by: Yurii Chan on 15/12/2006 04:52:50 is it really that hard to understand the new concept? if you see just the icon and no number following it, then it st...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.19 20:07:00
|
152. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Perhaps they should have stayed there. Anyone else thinking those opposed to this are scammers?
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.19 18:10:00
|
153. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: SSgt Sniper The dev team is well aware of this issue by now and apparently doesn't care. So if you want to have an effect, raise awareness in every local of every system you go through so folks now know about the issue. I'v...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.18 08:32:00
|
154. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Chronz I do not see how this is a bug in anyway shape or form- by default if there is no "x = quantity" then that CLEARY INDICATES THERES NO QUANTITY- I agree that only stupid ppl get scammed. Huh? Perhaps you should con...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.17 22:07:00
|
155. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sile Suirghiche Why would anyone actually argue so strenuously against this on it's own merits? Sile I can only assume that those who argue against this, are using it to scam people out of ISK. Otherwise, they're just ...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.17 09:34:00
|
156. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Moraguth I hear ya Dawne. I haven't been scammed, and i'm not likely to be scammed, but it should have a 1 in there. No, not just for the stupid people, and no, not to make this game turn into easy-mode (caldari?) or wow, bu...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.17 06:38:00
|
157. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aphotic Raven Those familiar with the trade system wont be had... just like.. omg... real life. Let's follow this to it's logical conclussion.... People who are caught scamming should be punished just like.. omg... real ...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.13 19:34:00
|
158. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aphotic Raven Scams are good.. keeps people on their toes... Contracts are useless.
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.13 19:31:00
|
159. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Redart Edited by: Redart on 12/12/2006 00:48:56 Originally by: Calio Originally by: Ariel Stardust Edited by: Ariel Stardust on 11/12/2006 20:37:05 Why do people confuse design decision with expl...
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.12 04:50:00
|
160. When is CCP going to declare this as exploiting a bug? (Contract Scam) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sorja This is not a 'bug' but a poor interface. It is indeed misleading and needs to be changed. Finally a voice of reason amoungst the, well whatever they are....
- by Dawne Xi - at 2006.12.12 04:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |